CLINICAL SAFETY PROFILE OF SOTALOL IN THE TREATMENT OF ARRHYTHMIAS

Citation
Dj. Macneil et al., CLINICAL SAFETY PROFILE OF SOTALOL IN THE TREATMENT OF ARRHYTHMIAS, The American journal of cardiology, 72(4), 1993, pp. 10000044-10000050
Citations number
10
Categorie Soggetti
Cardiac & Cardiovascular System
ISSN journal
00029149
Volume
72
Issue
4
Year of publication
1993
Pages
10000044 - 10000050
Database
ISI
SICI code
0002-9149(1993)72:4<10000044:CSPOSI>2.0.ZU;2-R
Abstract
The safety of sotalol was evaluated in 3,257 patients treated for card iac arrhythmias in double-blind and open-label clinical trials that su pport United States registration of the drug. In this composite popula tion, 80% of patients had structural heart disease and 42% had life-th reatening ventricular arrhythmias, i.e., ventricular tachycardia (VT) or fibrillation (VF). Proarrhythmia was reported in 141 patients (4.3% ). Of these, 78 (2.4%) had torsades de pointes and 26 (0.8%) had susta ined VT or VF. The overall incidence was higher in patients treated fo r sustained VT or VF (6.5%). In these patients, serious proarrhythmia was predominantly torsades de pointes (4.1%) and was more prevalent in patients with congestive heart failure and low ejection fraction. Tor sades de pointes was observed early in the course of treatment, and it s occurrence was related to dose. The overall mortality in patients tr eated wit sotalol was 4.3% (139 patients); in patients with life-threa tening arrhythmias, cardiac mortality was 4.8%. In only 27 patients (0 .8%) was the death thought to be potentially drug-related. The deaths were not related to dose. Data from a previously reported placebo-cont rolled postmyocardial infarction trial indicated no significant differ ence in mortality between sotalol and placebo. Heart failure was repor ted in 3.3% of patients and was most prevalent in those with a previou s history of congestive heart failure, cardiomyopathy, or structural h eart disease. The occurrence of heart failure was unrelated to dose or time on drug; in more than half of the patients, sotalol treatment wa s continued. On average, there was no decrease in ejection fraction. R eported adverse drug experiences were typical of beta blockers and res ulted in discontinuation of the drug in 18% of patients. There was no evidence of organ toxicity or interaction with concomitant therapy. As an antiarrhythmic agent, sotalol is generally well tolerated and has a favorable profile relative to that reported for many other agents.