Aes. Gimson et al., RANDOMIZED TRIAL OF VARICEAL BANDING LIGATION VERSUS INJECTION SCLEROTHERAPY FOR BLEEDING ESOPHAGEAL-VARICES, Lancet, 342(8868), 1993, pp. 391-394
Injection sclerotherapy of bleeding oesophageal varices is undoubtedly
beneficial but it is associated with a substantial complication rate,
and variceal rebleeding is common during the treatment period before
variceal obliteration is achieved. We aimed to find out whether endosc
opic variceal banding ligation is safer and more effective. The two me
thods were compared in a randomised controlled trial of 103 patients (
54 assigned to banding ligation, and 49 to injection sclerotherapy) of
whom 21 (39%) and 23 (47%), respectively, had active bleeding at inde
x endoscopy. Both treatments were highly effective in controlling acti
ve haemorrhage (91% and 92% respectively). Variceal obliteration was n
ot achieved for 22 patients in each group, but among those whose varic
es were eradicated, banding ligation achieved obliteration more quickl
y than did sclerotherapy (mean 39 [SD 4] vs 72 [7] days, p = 0.004) an
d in fewer endoscopy sessions (3.4 [2.2] vs 4.9 [3.5], p = 0.006). Reb
leeding was less common in the banding ligation group than in the scle
rotherapy group (16 [30%] vs 26 [53%], p < 0.05). There was no differe
nce in outcome between the groups, but 14 sclerotherapy patients were
withdrawn from the trial (7 for orthotopic liver transplantation) comp
ared with only 5 (1 for liver transplantation) in the banding ligation
group (p < 0.05). Complication rates were similar in the two groups.
Variceal banding ligation is a safe and effective technique, which obl
iterates varices more quickly and with a lower rebleeding rate than in
jection sclerotherapy.