LOW-DOSE DOBUTAMINE ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY DETECTS REVERSIBLE DYSFUNCTION AFTER THROMBOLYTIC THERAPY OF ACUTE MYOCARDIAL-INFARCTION

Citation
Sc. Smart et al., LOW-DOSE DOBUTAMINE ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY DETECTS REVERSIBLE DYSFUNCTION AFTER THROMBOLYTIC THERAPY OF ACUTE MYOCARDIAL-INFARCTION, Circulation, 88(2), 1993, pp. 405-415
Citations number
36
Categorie Soggetti
Cardiac & Cardiovascular System",Hematology
Journal title
ISSN journal
00097322
Volume
88
Issue
2
Year of publication
1993
Pages
405 - 415
Database
ISI
SICI code
0009-7322(1993)88:2<405:LDEDRD>2.0.ZU;2-Y
Abstract
Background. Dysfunction after thrombolytic therapy of acute myocardial infarction (MI) may be reversible. Early after myocardial infarction, both reversible and irreversible injury may be manifested by regional wall motion abnormalities. Improved wall thickening during dobutamine infusion (dobutamine-responsive wall motion) may accurately identify reversibly injured segments. Methods and Results. To determine whether dobutamine-responsive wall motion accurately detects reversible posti schemic dysfunction irrespective of infarct location, multistage (base line, 4 and 12 mug . kg-1 . min-1, and peak) dobutamine echocardiograp hy (DE) was performed within 7 days of thrombolytic therapy. Resting e chocardiography was repeated greater-than-or-equal-to 4 weeks after MI , and reversible dysfunction was defined as improved wall motion. The accuracy of dobutamine-responsive wall motion was compared with that o f signs of early reperfusion, non-Q-wave MI, and peak creatine kinase (CK). Sixty-three patients underwent DE without complications. Follow- up echocardiograms were done in 51 (81%) of these patients, and wall m otion improved in 22 (41%). Dobutamine-responsive wall motion during a ll stages of DE was very specific for reversible dysfunction (90% to 9 3%) but sensitive (86%) only when hemodynamics were not altered (low d ose, 4 mug . kg-1 - min-1 ). Non-Q-wave MI and a low peak CK (<1000 IU /mL) were also specific (89% to 93%) but less sensitive (64% [P=.16] a nd 55% [P<.05], respectively). Signs of early reperfusion did not iden tify postischemic dysfunction. Low-dose dobutamine-responsive wall mot ion and non-Q-wave MI independently identified reversible dysfunction, but only dobutamine-responsive wall motion was sensitive in all infar ct locations. Non-Q-wave MI was sensitive only in anterior infarction. Conclusions. Multistage dobutamine echocardiography can be performed safely early after thrombolytic therapy. Low-dose dobutamine-responsiv e wall motion accurately detected reversible dysfunction in all infarc t locations. Dobutamine-responsive wall motion and non-Q-wave infarcti on may be very useful for accurately identifying reversible dysfunctio n early after thrombolytic therapy for acute MI.