S. Bielamowicz et al., EFFECT OF TENSION, STIFFNESS, AND AIR-FLOW ON LARYNGEAL RESISTANCE INTHE IN-VIVO CANINE MODEL, The Annals of otology, rhinology & laryngology, 102(10), 1993, pp. 761-768
This study used an in vivo canine model of phonation to determine the
effects of airflow on glottal resistance at low, medium, and high leve
ls of recurrent laryngeal nerve (RLN) and superior laryngeal nerve (SL
N) stimulation. Static and dynamic trials of changing airflow were use
d to study the effects of airflow on glottal resistance during phonati
on. As reported previously, glottal resistance varies inversely as a f
unction of airflow. Increasing levels of RLN stimulation resulted in a
statistically significant increase in glottal resistance for each lev
el of airflow evaluated. Variation in SLN stimulation had no statistic
ally significant effects on the relationship between flow and resistan
ce. At airflow rates greater than 590 milliliters per second (mL/s), g
lottal resistance approached 0.1 mm Hg per mL/s for all levels of RLN
and SLN stimulation tested. These data support the collapsible tube mo
del of phonation.