W. Clark et S. Haldeman, THE DEVELOPMENT OF GUIDELINE FACTORS FOR THE EVALUATION OF DISABILITYIN NECK AND BACK INJURIES, Spine (Philadelphia, Pa. 1976), 18(13), 1993, pp. 1736-1745
This is the second article documenting the development of guideline fa
ctors for the evaluation of spine injuries by a committee supported by
the Division of Industrial Accidents (DIA) in the State of California
. The committee was asked to develop guidelines that incorporated cerv
ical and thoracic spine injuries into the original guidelines develope
d for lumbar spine injuries (Clark et al, Spine 1988; 13:332). Multipl
e Independent Medical Examiners (IMEs) were requested to rate disabili
ty on 42 case reports submitted to the DIA. A tremendous variation exi
sted in the disability rating recommended by physicians given the same
set of facts. One hundred eighty-five IMEs then were asked to evaluat
e a series of potential factors influencing disability. Each factor wa
s listed according to its perceived importance in determining disabili
ty. These factors then were subjected to an intensive search of the me
dical and scientific literature to determine their validity. A final l
ist of 28 factors for the cervical and thoracic spine were developed a
nd combined with the previously published factors for the lumbar spine
. This led to the development of 37 factors or guidelines for the eval
uation of spine disability. Testing of this schedule was performed by
reviewing 159 submitted disability consultation reports. This review s
howed that there were no factors in the reports that were not included
in the schedule. An average of 3.1 subjective factors and 2.3 objecti
ve factors were noted in the reports, with a very poor relationship be
tween the number of factors and the level of disability given by the a
ssessing physician. It is thought that the incorporation of the propos
ed guideline factors into the current disability rating system would a
llow for a more reproducible evaluation of disability and allow Worker
s' Compensation judges and administrators to make disability decisions
based on documentable and reliable facts.