Fifty consecutive Miller-Galante (Zimmer, Warsaw, IN) and Kinematic II
(Howmedica, Rutherford, NJ) total knee arthroplasties for osteoarthri
tis in patients 80 years of age and over were compared to 50 arthropla
sties in patients aged 65-69 years, with a minimum 2-year follow-up pe
riod. Each patient was assessed clinically using the Hospital for Spec
ial Surgery knee rating scores and radiographically by an independent
observer. Average age of the study group participants was 83 years and
of the comparison group, 68 years. Apart from age, the two groups wer
e similar with respect to sex, bilaterality, prosthetic type, and preo
perative Hospital for Special Surgery scores. No significant differenc
es were noted for pain, functional level, strength, stability, or rang
e of motion throughout the 2-year follow-up period. More octogenarian
patients were found to have a preoperative deformity, and these deform
ities were larger, on average, than in the retiree group, suggesting a
more advanced disease pathophysiology. A larger number of elderly pat
ients required continued use of walking aids. An analysis of the cost-
effectiveness data, collected for both groups, showed that although th
e in-hospital costs and length of stay were the same ($17,160 Can), th
e cost per patient after discharge was slightly greater ($2,000 Can) i
n the octogenarian. This prospective clinical study of total knee arth
roplasties for osteoarthritis has shown that it is a reliable and cost
-effective procedure for the octogenarian.