Gcf. Chan et al., MYELODYSPLASTIC SYNDROME IN CHILDREN - DIFFERENTIATION FROM ACUTE MYELOID-LEUKEMIA WITH A LOW BLAST COUNT, Leukemia, 11(2), 1997, pp. 206-211
To evaluate diagnostic criteria, disease characteristics, and the clin
ical course of pediatric myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS), we reviewed 3
27 consecutive cases diagnosed with de novo acute myeloid leukemia (AM
L) or MDS at St jude Children's Research Hospital between February 198
0 and January 1993, Among 49 cases with <30% marrow blasts (consistent
with FAB criteria and common diagnostic practice for MDS), eight had
karyotypes associated with de novo AML (four with t(8;21)(q22;q22) and
one each with inv(16)(p13q22), t(11;17)(q23;q21), t(9;11)(p22;q13), a
nd i(1)(q10)), We termed these cases AML with a low blast count (AML-L
BC) and compared their clinical and morphologic features with those of
the remaining 41 cases, AML-LBC cases had little or no hematopoietic
dysplasia, MDS cases consisted of refractory anemia (RA, n = 6), RA wi
th ring sideroblasts (n = 2), RA with excess blasts (RAEB, n = 4), RAE
B in transformation (n = 14), and chronic myelomonocytic leukemia (n =
15), Most had moderate/severe or multilineage hematopoietic dysplasia
, with significantly higher dysplasia scores than AML-LBC cases (P = 0
.007), Only 30% of patients with MDS achieved complete remission (CR)
after two cycles of AML-directed therapy, compared with 88% of patient
s with AML-LBC (P = 0.0001); MDS patients tended to experience prolong
ed severe cytopenias with chemotherapy, The Li-year survival for MDS p
atients was 23% +/- 7% (s.e.), vs 50% +/- 18% (s.e.) for AML-LBC (P =
0.048), AML-LBC patients frequently had chloromas; none were seen in M
DS patients. We conclude that the 30% blast threshold is ineffective f
or separation of AML and MDS in pediatric patients, and that genetic d
ata should be included in this decision process, AML-LBC, defined by <
30% blasts in bone marrow and cyto- (or molecular) genetic abnormaliti
es associated with de novo AML, and characterized by absent or mild ma
rrow dysplasia, is biologically and clinically distinct from MDS and s
hould he treated as de novo AML. Outcome in pediatric MDS remains poor
, and new treatment strategies are needed for these patients.