The physiologic changes that occur when the small bowel is used as a r
eservoir, as in the ileal pouch-anal anastomosis, are poorly understoo
d. Alterations in bowel permeability, which may lead to bacterial tran
slocation that could result in illness or dysfunction of the pouch, ma
y be one such consequence of the pouch procedure. METHODS: Whole-bowel
permeability was evaluated in patients with and without the pouch thr
ough the use of an orally consumed nonmetabolizable sugar clearance te
chnique. Patients in whom the ileal pouch-anal anastomosis was perform
ed for ulcerative colitis (17 patients) and patients with familial pol
yposis (7 patients) were compared with normal healthy volunteers (10 p
atients) and patients with ulcerative colitis with and without curativ
e colectomy and ileostomy (6 and 5 patients, respectively). RESULTS: M
easured by this technique, no differences were noted in bowel permeabi
lity between the volunteers and patients with ulcerative colitis, even
after colectomy and ileostomy (1.7 +/- 0.4 in normal healthy voluntee
rs, 1.8 +/- 0.5 in patients with ulcerative colitis without stoma, and
1.4 +/- 0.2 in patients with ulcerative colitis with ileostomy). The
group of patients with an ileal reservoir, however, had a significantl
y increased index of measured bowel permeability (3.5 +/- 0.5 in patie
nts with ulcerative colitis and 5.1 +/- 0.7 in patients with familial
polyposis; P < 0.05 by analysis of variance compared with normal healt
hy volunteers and patients with ulcerative colitis with or without ile
ostomy). CONCLUSION: The exact site, cause, and consequence of this po
ssible alteration of bowel permeability are unclear but appear to be r
elated to the presence of the pouch and are not caused by the underlyi
ng pathologic diagnosis.