NONOCULAR CHLAMYDIA INFECTION AND RISK OF OCULAR REINFECTION AFTER MASS TREATMENT IN A TRACHOMA HYPERENDEMIC AREA

Citation
S. West et al., NONOCULAR CHLAMYDIA INFECTION AND RISK OF OCULAR REINFECTION AFTER MASS TREATMENT IN A TRACHOMA HYPERENDEMIC AREA, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science, 34(11), 1993, pp. 3194-3198
Citations number
12
Categorie Soggetti
Ophthalmology
ISSN journal
01460404
Volume
34
Issue
11
Year of publication
1993
Pages
3194 - 3198
Database
ISI
SICI code
0146-0404(1993)34:11<3194:NCIARO>2.0.ZU;2-G
Abstract
Purpose. The presence of nasal discharge on a child's face increases t he risk of active trachoma, suggesting that Chlamydia trachomatis in n asal secretions may be a possible source of ocular reinfection. The pr evalence of chlamydia in nasal secretions and the risk of reinfection after mass treatment was investigated in a hyperendemic area of Tanzan ia. Methods. In one village a total of 232 children aged 1 to 7 years were followed before and after mass treatment. Clinical trachoma, and microbiologic evidence of chlamydia, were assessed at baseline, 2 and 4 weeks into mass treatment, and 4 weeks after treatment stopped. The presence of chlamydia in ocular and nasal secretions was determined by polymerase chain reaction-enzyme immunoassay techniques. Results. Of the 232 children, 59% had clinical trachoma and 27% had nasal specimen s positive for chlamydia. Children with positive ocular chlamydia spec imens and/or clinical trachoma were significantly more likely to have positive nasal specimens. At the end of mass treatment, only 4% of chi ldren had positive ocular specimens. However, 1 month after treatment stopped, the incidence of new infection was 2 1%. The rate of new ocul ar infections in those who had-negative ocular specimens after treatme nt was similar between those who had positive and those who had negati ve nasal specimens at baseline. Positive ocular specimens at baseline was not a predictor of risk of new infection after treatment (odds rat io = 1. 18, 95% confidence interval = 0.58, 2.40), suggesting these ne w infections were not the result of latent or persistent organism. Con clusions. These data do not support a role for nasal secretions in cau sing reinfection after treatment. One mass topical treatment alone is unlikely to be effective in trachoma hyperendemic areas as shown by th e rapid re-emergence of infection.