Am. Skinner et al., VARIABILITY IN THE URINARY-EXCRETION OF GROWTH-HORMONE IN CHILDREN - A COMPARISON WITH OTHER URINARY PROTEINS, Journal of Endocrinology, 138(2), 1993, pp. 337-343
As a basis for assessment of the clinical validity of urinary GH (uGH)
measurements in children, the day-to-day variability in renal handlin
g of GH has been compared with that of albumin, N-acetylglucosaminidas
e (NAG) and creatinine. Five overnight urine specimens were collected
over a 2-week period from 78 healthy children (aged 5-16 years), 20 of
normal stature and 58 with growth disorders; ten children were classi
fied as GH-deficient (GHD) and 48 were designated short normal (SN). T
he variability of excretion of each substance was expressed as a coeff
icient of variation (C.V.) which was not influenced by expressing the
urine results as total mass excreted, concentration, excretion rate or
as a ratio to creatinine. There was considerable night-to-night varia
bility in the excretion of all substances (mean C.V. values for all gr
oups: 56% for albumin, 41% for GH, 33% for NAG and 27% for creatinine)
. No differences were found in the variability of GH excretion between
males and females, nor between prepubertal and pubertal subjects. The
mean C.V. for uGH excretion ranged from 37% in normal and 35% in SN c
hildren to 52% in those with GHD (P<0.05). Assay variation rather than
a change in renal protein handling accounted for the large variations
in uGH concentrations of < 5 pg/ml, thus contributing to the high uGH
C.V. of the GHD group. Increasing the number of samples collected (up
to five) decreased the expected sample variation (error) for uGH but
not significantly and only improved efficiency in the diagnosis of gro
wth disorders from 91 to 95%, while reducing the convenience and pract
icality of the test. These results indicate that variation in urinary
protein excretion over a 2-week period is considerable (albumin>GH>NAG
) in both normal children and those with growth disorders. To apply th
is test to routine clinical management, we recommend comparison of a s
ingle overnight uGH measurement with normal ranges derived from age-,
sex- and pubertal status-matched children.