COPING MODELING PROBLEM-SOLVING VERSUS MASTERY MODELING - EFFECTS ON ADHERENCE, IN-SESSION PROCESS, AND SKILL ACQUISITION IN A RESIDENTIAL PARENT-TRAINING PROGRAM

Citation
Ce. Cunningham et al., COPING MODELING PROBLEM-SOLVING VERSUS MASTERY MODELING - EFFECTS ON ADHERENCE, IN-SESSION PROCESS, AND SKILL ACQUISITION IN A RESIDENTIAL PARENT-TRAINING PROGRAM, Journal of consulting and clinical psychology, 61(5), 1993, pp. 871-877
Citations number
57
Categorie Soggetti
Psycology, Clinical
ISSN journal
0022006X
Volume
61
Issue
5
Year of publication
1993
Pages
871 - 877
Database
ISI
SICI code
0022-006X(1993)61:5<871:CMPVMM>2.0.ZU;2-T
Abstract
This trial compared two approaches used to introduce parenting skills in a residential staff training program. Fifty staff were randomly ass igned to: mastery modelling in which videotaped models demonstrated ne w skills, coping modelling problem solving (CMPS) in which participant s formulated their own solutions to the errors depicted by videotaped models, or a waiting-list control group. In both, leaders used modelli ng, role playing, and homework projects to promote mastery and transfe r of new skills. The skills of all groups improved, but CMPS participa nts attended more sessions, were late to fewer sessions, completed mor e homework, engaged in more cooperative in-session interaction, rated the program more positively, and reported higher job accomplishment sc ores. These data suggest that CMPS allowing participants to formulate their own solutions may enhance adherence and reduce the resistance ob served in more didactic programs.