Mk. Goldhaber et al., LONG-TERM RISK OF HYSTERECTOMY AMONG 80,007 STERILIZED AND COMPARISONWOMEN AT KAISER PERMANENTE, 1971-1987, American journal of epidemiology, 138(7), 1993, pp. 508-521
To study the long-term risk of hysterectomy after tubal sterilization,
the authors analyzed historical hospital discharge data on 39,502 par
ous women sterilized during 1971-1984 and 40,505 comparison women matc
hed on age, race, parity, and interval since last birth. Sterilized wo
men were significantly more likely than were comparison women to under
go hysterectomy (relative risk (RR) = 1.35, 95% confidence interval (C
I) 1.26-1.44), especially for diagnoses of menstrual dysfunction and p
elvic pain (RR = 1.88, 95% CI 1.65-2.13). Higher relative risks were n
ot associated with greater tissue-destructive methods of tubal occlusi
on. Relative risks were highest for women who were young on the refere
nce date (RR = 2.45, 95% CI 1.79-3.36 for women aged 20-24 years), but
declined steadily as age increased (RR = 0.96, 95% CI 0.72-1.28 for w
omen aged 40-49 years). In all age groups, relative risks were signifi
cantly above 1.00 after 7 years of follow-up. Reasons for elevated ris
ks may be related to a greater willingness of sterilized women to forg
o their uteruses. The emergence of greater risk in all age groups, how
ever, prevents the authors from ruling out a possible latent biologic
effect of tubal sterilization.