B. Meyerwyss et al., ASSESSMENT OF LIDOCAINE METABOLITE FORMATION IN COMPARISON WITH OTHERQUANTITATIVE LIVER-FUNCTION TESTS, Journal of hepatology, 19(1), 1993, pp. 133-139
In clinical practice, the seriousness of liver disease is assessed bas
ed on the combined information from clinical examination, routine bioc
hemical tests, and liver histology. Recently, the assessment of hepati
c lidocaine metabolism has been proposed as a quantitative liver funct
ion test offering valuable additional information. To evaluate whether
this new liver function test reflects the combined clinical assessmen
t, we prospectively measured lidocaine metabolism in 111 patients with
well characterized liver disease. In addition, lidocaine test results
were compared with the aminopyrine breath test and the galactose elim
ination capacity. Lidocaine (1 mg/kg) was injected i.v. and serum conc
entrations of its main metabolite monoethylglycinexylidide were determ
ined after 15 min. The results varied widely and the means (+/- S.D.)
were similar among patients with mild liver disease (46 +/- 23 ng/ml),
but significantly (P < 0.05) lower among patients with Child class A
cirrhosis (19 +/- 11 ng/ml) or Child class B or C cirrhosis (21 +/- 19
ng/ml). The [C-13]aminopyrine breath test, however, gave a better dis
crimination among patients with increasing severity of liver disease t
han lidocaine metabolite formation. The galactose elimination capacity
finally best separated patients with mild liver disease from those wi
th cirrhosis. The correlations between any two of the different quanti
tative liver function tests were weak (R2 consistently < 0.2). We conc
lude that lidocaine metabolite formation, like other quantitative live
r function tests that are based on the microsomal metabolism of model
compounds, quantitates a very particular enzymatic reaction which may
not be representative for the functional reserve of the entire organ.