M. Steriade et al., CHOLINERGIC AND NORADRENERGIC MODULATION OF THE SLOW (APPROXIMATE-TO-0.3 HZ) OSCILLATION IN NEOCORTICAL CELLS, Journal of neurophysiology, 70(4), 1993, pp. 1385-1400
1. The pedunculopontine tegmental (PPT) cholinergic nucleus and the lo
cus coeruleus (LC) noradrenergic nucleus were electrically stimulated
to investigate their effects on the recently described slow oscillatio
n (almost-equal-to 0.3 Hz) of neocortical neurons. Intracellular recor
dings of slowly oscillating, regular-spiking and intrinsically burstin
g neurons from cortical association areas 5 and 7 (n = 140) were perfo
rmed in anesthetized cats. 2. Pulse trains to the PPT nucleus produced
the blockage of rhythmic (almost-equal-to 0.3 Hz) depolarizing-hyperp
olarizing sequences in 79% of tested cortical neurons and transformed
this slow cellular rhythm into tonic firing. The latency of the cortic
al cellular response to PPT stimulation was 1.2 +/- 0.5 (SE) s and its
duration was 15.9 +/- 1.9 s. The PPT-elicited suppression of the slow
cellular oscillation was accompanied by an activation of the electroe
ncephalogram (EEG) having a similar time course. Fast Fourier transfor
m analyses of EEG activities before and after PPT stimulation showed t
hat the PPT-evoked changes consisted of decreased power of slow rhythm
s (0-8 Hz) and increased power of fast rhythms (24-33 Hz); these chang
es were statistically significant. 3. The blockage of the slow cellula
r oscillation was mainly achieved through the diminution or suppressio
n of the long-lasting hyperpolarizations separating the rhythmic depol
arizing envelopes. This effect was observed even when PPT pulse trains
disrupted the oscillation without inducing overt depolarization and i
ncreased firing rate. The durations of the prolonged hyperpolarization
s were measured during a 40-s window (20 s before and 20 s after the P
PT pulse train) and were found to decrease from 1.5 +/- 0.2 to 0.7 +/-
0.1 s. The values of the product resulting from the duration (in seco
nds), the amplitude (in millivolts), and number of such hyperpolarizin
g events within 20-s periods were 51.5 5 and 5.1 +/- 1.9 before and af
ter PPT stimulation, respectively. 4. The PPT effect was suppressed by
systemic administration of a muscarinic antagonist, scopolamine, but
not by mecamylamine, a nicotinic antagonist. 5. The PPT effect on cell
ular and EEG cortical slow oscillation survived, although its duration
was reduced, in animals with kainate-induced lesions of thalamic nucl
ei projecting to areas 5 and 7 (n = 3) as well as in animals with simi
lar excitotoxic lesions leading to extensive neuronal loss in nucleus
basalis (n = 2). These data indicate that the PPT effect is transmitte
d to neocortex through either thalamic or basal forebrain relays. 6. L
C stimulation induced the blockage of the slow cellular rhythm as well
as an activated EEG response, similar to the PPT effect. The threshol
d of the LC-induced response was usually higher than that of the PPT-e
licited response. The LC effects were blocked after systemic administr
ation of clonidine, an alpha2 agonist. 7. The blockage of the slow cor
tical oscillation was also seen during short-lasting epochs of EEG act
ivation occurring spontaneously. 8. We conclude that the disruption of
the slow cortical oscillation mainly results from the suppression of
the long-lasting hyperpolarizations and we suggest that this effect ma
y be due, at least partially, to the cholinergic or noradrenergic bloc
kage of Ca2+-dependent K+ currents.