Dj. Brenner et al., CLASSIFICATION OF CITROBACTERIA BY DNA HYBRIDIZATION - DESIGNATION OFCITROBACTER-FARMERI SP-NOV, CITROBACTER-YOUNGAE SP-NOV, CITROBACTER-BRAAKII SP-NOV, CITROBACTER-WERKMANII SP-NOV, CITROBACTER-SEDLAKII SP-NOV, AND 3 UNNAMED CITROBACTER GENOMOSPECIES, International journal of systematic bacteriology, 43(4), 1993, pp. 645-658
DNA relatedness studies (hydroxyapatite method) were done on 112 strai
ns of citrobacteria. By using the recommended definition of a genomosp
ecies 11 genomospecies were identified in the genus Citrobacter. These
genomospecies were separable by their biochemical profiles. Citrobact
er koseri (Citrobacter diversus) and Citrobacter amalonaticus proved t
o be homogeneous species, as previously described. C. amalonaticus bio
group 1, as described by Farmer et al. (J. Clin. Microbiol. 21:46-76,
1985), was shown to be a separate homogeneous species, which was named
Citrobacter farmeri sp. nov. The Citrobacter freundii complex was qui
te heterogeneous. C.freundii sensu stricto, as represented by the type
strain, contained only 9 of 66 strains in this complex. The remaining
57 strains were members of seven genomospecies. Genomospecies 5, cont
aining 21 strains, was named Citrobacter youngae sp. nov. Genomospecie
s 6, containing 15 strains, was named Citrobacter braakii sp. nov. Gen
omospecies 7 and 8, each containing six strains, were named Citrobacte
r werkmanii sp. nov. and Citrobacter sedlakii sp. nov., respectively.
Genomospecies 9, 10, and 11, each containing three strains, were not n
amed.