Bf. Hobbs et al., MEASURING THE ECONOMIC VALUE OF DEMAND-SIDE AND SUPPLY RESOURCES IN INTEGRATED RESOURCE PLANNING-MODELS, IEEE transactions on power systems, 8(3), 1993, pp. 979-987
When comparing the economics of alternative portfolios of supply and d
emand-side resources, utility planners should consider not only costs
but also effects upon the benefits, or ''value,'' that electricity con
sumers receive. A method for including such effects in comprehensive r
esource planning models is presented. This method considers the value
impacts of electric rate changes, ''takeback'' of energy savings in co
nservation programs, and increases in energy services provided by load
building or valley-filling programs. In general, the method rewards r
esource portfolios that cause rates to move closer to marginal cost or
increase the energy services provided. Applications of a net value ob
jective in several resource planning models are summarized. They confi
rm that optimizing net value can yield different resource portfolios t
han minimizing cost.