Sk. Kar et al., CLINICAL FILARIAL DISEASE IN 2 ETHNIC ENDEMIC COMMUNITIES OF ORISSA, INDIA, Journal of tropical medicine and hygiene, 96(5), 1993, pp. 311-316
To evaluate the possible role of ethnicity in susceptibility to filari
al infection, a comparative study of the prevalence of filarial infect
ion was initiated in an endemic village inhabited by two ethnic popula
tions of mainlanders and tribals. An age and sex matched sampled popul
ation of 591 mainlanders and 106 tribals was studied by detailed clini
cal and parasitological (60 mm(3) blood) examinations. Sera collected
from both population groups (26 each) matched for clinical stage of in
fection were analysed for humoral immune responses such as antifilaria
l IgG, circulating filarial antigen and immune complex level. The over
all prevalences of clinical disease and infection in both mainlanders
(34.18 and 14.4%) and tribals (25.47 and 17.9%) were comparable. Howev
er, both annual average adenolymphangitic attack rate (1.77 year(-1))
and the prevalence of chronic filarial disease (22.6%) amongst tribals
were significantly lower. No true elephantiasis was observed in triba
ls. No significant difference was observed in their humoral immune res
ponse, although the antifilarial antibody of IgG class in all stages o
f filarial infection was lower in tribals than in mainlanders. The res
ults did not reveal any difference in susceptibility to filarial infec
tion in the ethnic groups. The paucity of progressive lesions observed
in tribals possibly reflects a difference in the anatomy of lymphatic
s or genetic or immunoregulatory mechanisms, that needs further study.