THE EFFECTS OF AN ANTIPROGESTIN, MIFEPRISTONE, AND AN ANTIESTROGEN, TAMOXIFEN, ON ENDOMETRIAL 17-BETA-HYDROXYSTEROID DEHYDROGENASE AND PROGESTIN AND ESTROGEN-RECEPTORS DURING THE LUTEAL-PHASE OF THE MENSTRUAL-CYCLE - AN IMMUNOHISTOCHEMICAL STUDY
O. Maentausta et al., THE EFFECTS OF AN ANTIPROGESTIN, MIFEPRISTONE, AND AN ANTIESTROGEN, TAMOXIFEN, ON ENDOMETRIAL 17-BETA-HYDROXYSTEROID DEHYDROGENASE AND PROGESTIN AND ESTROGEN-RECEPTORS DURING THE LUTEAL-PHASE OF THE MENSTRUAL-CYCLE - AN IMMUNOHISTOCHEMICAL STUDY, The Journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism, 77(4), 1993, pp. 913-918
The effects of a progesterone antagonist, mifepristone (RU486), and an
estrogen antagonist, tamoxifen, given during the early luteal phase o
n endometrial 17beta-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase (17HSD) and estrogen
(ER) and progesterone (PR) receptors were studied. Eleven regularly m
enstruating women were studied during control and treatment cycles. In
the treatment cycle on day LH+2 (2 days after the peak serum LH conce
ntration), 10 subjects received a single dose of 200 mg mifepristone,
and 9 received 2 doses of 40 mg tamoxifen on days LH+2 and LH+3. In ad
dition, 4 subjects received 400 mg mifepristone in a separate treatmen
t cycle. 17HSD, ER, and PR were measured immunohistochemically in endo
metrial tissue specimens taken on days LH+6 to LH+8. Blood samples wer
e conducted during control and treatment cycles, and serum estradiol,
progesterone, and LH concentrations were quantified by RIA. Administra
tion of mifepristone blocked the induction of 17HSD by progesterone an
d prevented the expression of 17HSD in gland and surface epithelial ce
lls in 8 patients. In 2 patients, staining of 17HSD was seen during bo
th the control and mifepristone treatment cycles. The higher dose of m
ifepristone additionally given to four subjects did not block the expr
ession of 17HSD in 2 cases where blocking was observed with the lower
dose of mifepristone, and in 1 of these patients, very strong staining
of 17HSD was observed in basal cells beneath the epithelial cells. ER
and PR showed intense staining in the nuclei of both gland and stroma
l cells in mifepristone treatment cycles, whereas receptor staining wa
s faint or absent in the respective control cycles. Tamoxifen did not
have any significant effect on staining of 17HSD or the abundance of r
eceptors. Serum concentrations of estradiol, progesterone, and LH were
not significantly affected by the administration of mifepristone or t
amoxifen. This study reveals that mifepristone, administered in the ea
rly luteal phase, usually blocks the expression of 17HSD and the down-
regulation of PR and ER. However, the expression of 17HSD in some pati
ents may reflect the ineffectiveness of the mifepristone treatment use
d to prevent implantation in certain subjects.