Bt. Faure et al., COMPARISON OF THE SUBVASTUS AND PARAMEDIAN SURGICAL APPROACHES IN BILATERAL KNEE ARTHROPLASTY, The Journal of arthroplasty, 8(5), 1993, pp. 511-516
A prospective randomized study was performed on 20 patients undergoing
one-stage bilateral knee arthroplasty. One knee was exposed using a s
tandard median parapatellar arthrotomy and the other knee with a subva
stus arthrotomy. All patients underwent quantitative strength testing
before surgery and at 1 week, 1 month, and 3 months after surgery. The
knees were also evaluated for range of motion, and patients, who were
blinded as to the approach used, completed questionnaires at each eva
luation period as to their preference, if any, regarding knee pain and
level of function. There was no difference in the range of motion bet
ween knees exposed with the paramedian or subvastus arthrotomy at any
time period. The subvastus knees demonstrated significantly greater st
rength at the 1-week and 1-month intervals, but there was no strength
difference at the 3-month interval. There were more lateral releases p
erformed in the paramedium knees, and three minor complications were r
elated to the subvastus approach. Patients who expressed a preference
chose the subvastus knee 4:1 over the paramedian knee. The subvastus a
pproach offers a reasonable alternative to the paramedian arthrotomy a
nd preserves greater quadriceps strength in the early postoperative pe
riod.