It is usually assumed that the 'social construction' metaphor has one
key meaning that is well understood across social studies of science.
But a look at some of the texts that were, and are, central to introdu
cing and defining 'social construction' in science studies shows that
there are widely varying uses of the metaphor: processes of constructi
on differ with the types of objects that can be constructed. This pape
r identifies four prominent interpretations that have led to interesti
ng insights and discussions. Though these different social constructio
ns have generally been fused together in science studies, they are eas
ily separable, and should be separated, since they are not equally ten
able. In particular, 'neo-Kantian' or 'idealist' constructivism has we
ak arguments supporting it and, contrary to the standard rhetoric, is
the least important of these different constructivisms to most of the
actual work done in social studies of science.