LONG-TERM RESULTS OF A PROSPECTIVE RANDOMIZED TRIAL OF ADJUVANT BRACHYTHERAPY IN THE MANAGEMENT OF COMPLETELY RESECTED SOFT-TISSUE SARCOMASOF THE EXTREMITY AND SUPERFICIAL TRUNK
Lb. Harrison et al., LONG-TERM RESULTS OF A PROSPECTIVE RANDOMIZED TRIAL OF ADJUVANT BRACHYTHERAPY IN THE MANAGEMENT OF COMPLETELY RESECTED SOFT-TISSUE SARCOMASOF THE EXTREMITY AND SUPERFICIAL TRUNK, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics, 27(2), 1993, pp. 259-265
Citations number
19
Categorie Soggetti
Oncology,"Radiology,Nuclear Medicine & Medical Imaging
Purpose: A prospective randomized trial evaluating adjuvant brachyther
apy for soft tissue sarcomas was conducted between July 1982 and July
1987. Methods and Materials: One hundred twenty-six patients with soft
tissue sarcoma of the extremity or superficial trunk (STS) underwent
grossly complete resection with limb-sparing surgery. Intra-operativel
y, patients were randomized to receive either adjuvant brachytherapy (
BRT) or no further therapy (no BRT). BRT consisted of an Iridium-192 i
mplant which delivered 4200-4500 cGy over 4-6 days. Total hospital sta
y for combined surgery and BRT was 10-14 days. Patients in each group
were well matched with respect to age, sex, site, tumor size, depth, h
istologic type, and grade. Median follow-up is 66.5 months for all liv
ing patients. Results: At 5 years, local control was 82% in the BRT gr
oup vs. 67% in the no BRT group (p = .049). When analyzed by histologi
c grade, high grade tumors had local control of 90% with BRT vs. 65% w
ith no BRT (p = .013). There was no difference in local control in the
low grade patients in either arm. At 5 years, the proportion free of
distant metastases was approximately 76% in both arms, with no differe
nce between BRT and no BRT. When analyzed by grade, high grade patient
s had a similar proportion free of distant metastasis in the BRT vs. n
o BRT arms despite improved local control in those receiving BRT. Simi
larly, the disease-specific survival for all patients at 5 years was 8
1% for BRT vs. 80% for no BRT (p = NS). When analyzed by grade, and tr
eatment (BRT vs. no BRT), 5-year disease-specific survival for high gr
ade was the same in both groups.Conclusions: Adjuvant BRT significantl
y improves local control in completely resected STS. This improvement
is confined to patients with high grade histology. BRT provides excell
ent local control in this group, and significantly shortens the treatm
ent time when compared to adjuvant external beam radiation. However, t
he improved local control does not translate into either decreased dis
tant metastasis or increased disease-specific survival.