L. Chaiken et al., POSITRON EMISSION TOMOGRAPHY WITH FLUORODEOXYGLUCOSE TO EVALUATE TUMOR RESPONSE AND CONTROL AFTER RADIATION-THERAPY, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics, 27(2), 1993, pp. 455-464
Citations number
40
Categorie Soggetti
Oncology,"Radiology,Nuclear Medicine & Medical Imaging
Purpose: Following radiation therapy, evaluation of viable tumor can o
ften be difficult with anatomic imaging criteria (tumor size alone). I
n this study, the utility of biochemical imaging with the glucose anal
og 2-[F-18]fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose and positron emission tomography w
as investigated in patients treated with radiation therapy. Methods an
d Materials: Between 1990 and 1992, 19 patients were studied, includin
g 15 patients with head and neck cancer, 4 oropharynx, 4 sinus, 3 lary
nx, 2 hypopharynx, 2 oral cavity [one patient], 1 nasopharynx), and 4
patients with breast cancer. Post-radiation positron emission tomograp
hy with 2-[F-18]fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose studies were done in all pati
ents, with 9 head and neck patients receiving pre-radiation positron e
mission tomography with 2-[F-18]fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose scans as well
. Results were correlated with other imaging techniques and pathology.
Results: Positron emission tomography with 2-[F-18]fluoro-2-deoxy-D-g
lucose detected head and neck primary tumors and lymph node metastases
in all nine pre-radiation scans, while magnetic resonance imaging fai
led to detect two primary tumors. Serial positron emission tomography
with 2-[F-18]fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose showed a significant decrease in
tumor activity after radiation therapy, compared to pre-radiation lev
els, (p < 0.05), except for two patients with increased uptake at the
primary site. Biopsies of these two patients showed persistent/recurre
nt disease after radiation therapy, which was not detected by magnetic
resonance imaging. Six additional head and neck patients, with suspic
ious examination and inconclusive magnetic resonance imaging, were ima
ged with positron emission tomography after radiation therapy only. Fi
ve patients had increased positron emission tomography activity, with
corresponding biopsies positive in four patients, and negative in one
patient with clinically worsening symptoms. The remaining sixth patien
t had minimal and stable positron emission tomography uptake, and is i
mproving clinically. Four patients had mammogram findings suspicious f
or recurrence after conservation treatment for breast cancer. Positron
emission tomography with 2-[F-18]fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose showed no f
ocal activity in the breast in two patients, and increased activity in
the ares suspicious for recurrence in the other two patients. Biopsie
s correlated with positron emission tomography results. Conclusion: Ch
anges and presence of positron emission tomography with 2-[F-18]fluoro
-2-deoxy-D-glucose activity correlated with pathologic findings in hea
d and neck and breast cancer patients in this series. In patients with
elevated or rising positron emission tomography activity after radiat
ion therapy, persistent or recurrent disease was found in 89% of patie
nts, (8/9). Magnetic resonance imaging did not detect the head and nec
k recurrences, and mammography was suspicious in patients with both be
nign and malignant breast changes after radiation therapy. In addition
, our data indicate that in head and neck patients with pre-radiation
positron emission tomography scans, a significant decrease in activity
should occur after radiaton therapy, if local control is to be expect
ed.