To evaluate the reliability of noninvasive oximeters during exercise i
n patients with cystic fibrosis (CF), we studied 9 patients during exe
rcise tests, using 3 devices (Hewlett-Packard 47201A, Biox-Ohmeda 3700
, Nellcor 100), comparing oximetry readings with arterial blood co-oxi
metry. Fifty samples from preexercise, exercise, and recovery were col
lected; and paired measurements were analyzed for bias (arterial blood
gas SaO2 - noninvasive SaO2) and precision (I SD of the bias). Values
were available for the Hewlett-Packard and the Biox-Ohmeda at all 50
collection times. The Nellcor failed to read on four occasions, all du
ring exercise. The accuracy of the Biox-Ohmeda readings was significan
tly worse during exercise than rest, while the Nellcor and the Hewlett
-Packard performance did not differ significantly between exercise and
rest. During hypoxemia (SaO2 <90 percent as determined by co-oximetry
on arterial blood), the Biox-Ohmeda and Nellcor consistently overesti
mated saturation, with mean bias of - 6.1 percent and - 3.0 percent, r
espectively. The Hewlett-Packard was more reliable and valid during hy
poxemia, with a mean bias of - 1.0 percent. The Nellcor read significa
ntly more accurately in the six patients with severe digital clubbing
than in the three patients with mild digital clubbing. It is important
to be aware of possible limitations of noninvasive oximeters before a
ccepting them as accurate.