Ha. Bivins et al., RANDOMIZED TRIAL OF ORAL INDOMETHACIN AND TERBUTALINE SULFATE FOR THELONG-TERM SUPPRESSION OF PRETERM LABOR, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology, 169(4), 1993, pp. 1065-1070
OBJECTIVE: Our purpose was to determine the efficacy and safety of lon
g-term oral tocolysis with indomethacin or terbutaline sulfate. STUDY
DESIGN: Seventy-one patients at 26 to 32 weeks' gestation admitted for
preterm labor were prospectively randomized to receive oral indometha
cin or terbutaline sulfate after successful intravenous tocolysis. Pat
ients were monitored weekly for cervical change, maternal side effects
, amniotic fluid volume, and constriction of the fetal ductus arterios
us. Patients receiving indomethacin were converted to terbutaline at 3
4 weeks or with the occurrence of fetal ductal constriction or oligohy
dramnios. RESULTS: Of 71 patients randomized six were excluded after r
andomization. Thirty-three patients were randomized to indomethacin an
d thirty-two to terbutaline. There were no differences in the percenta
ge of patients achieving 34 weeks of gestation. No differences in neon
atal outcome were noted. Nine (27%) fetuses receiving indomethacin had
constriction of the fetal ductus arteriosus, and 13 (38%) had oligohy
dramnios. Most patients on terbutaline reported beta-mimetic side effe
cts (53%), but only one required discontinuation of therapy. CONCLUSIO
N: Both indomethacin and terbutaline sulfate are effective tocolytics,
but major fetal side effects are common with long-term indomethacin u
se.