P. Zeltz et al., EDITING OF THE CHLOROPLAST RPOB TRANSCRIPT IS INDEPENDENT OF CHLOROPLAST TRANSLATION AND SHOWS DIFFERENT PATTERNS IN BARLEY AND MAIZE, EMBO journal, 12(11), 1993, pp. 4291-4296
Sequence analysis of amplified cDNAs derived from the maize chloroplas
t rpoB transcript which encodes the beta subunit of a chloroplast spec
ific, DNA dependent RNA polymerase reveals four C-to-U editing sites c
lustered within 150 nucleotides of the 5' terminal region of the rpoB
message. These newly identified editing sites confirm the bias of chlo
roplast editing for certain codon transitions and for second codon pos
itions which both appear suggestive for an involvement of the translat
ional apparatus in the editing process. This supposition prompted us t
o investigate editing of the rpoB transcript from ribosome deficient,
and hence protein synthesis deficient, plastids of the barley mutant a
lbostrians. In this mutant editing is, however, not impaired at any of
the editing sites functional in the barley wild type rpoB transcript.
This demonstrates that chloroplast editing is neither linked to nor d
ependent on the chloroplast translational apparatus. As a further cons
equence any peptide components required for chloroplast editing must b
e encoded in the nuclear genome. In spite of strong sequence conservat
ion only three of the four editing sites identified in the maize rpoB
transcript are functional in barley. This indicates that sequences sur
rounding an editing site alone are not sufficient as determinants for
the editing process in chloroplasts, but that trans-acting templates c
arrying the editing information for each individual site may also be r
equired.