Because of methodological reasons, within the first day after a head t
rauma, CT scan often does not demonstrate all the pathological consequ
ences of brain injury. Additionally, secondary sequelae are frequent e
vents. In our series of 129 patients the findings on subsequent CT sca
ns done during the posttraumatic course were worse compared to the ini
tial CT in 45% of patients. This deterioration on the CT scan was seen
irrespective of the initial GCS score and the initial diagnosis of ci
rcumscribed or diffuse injury. The event observed most often was bleed
ing into a preexisting contusion or even bleeding into a region which
had looked normal on the first CT scan. In the vast majority of cases,
this happened within the first 2 weeks after the initial trauma. We c
onclude that an initially pathological CT should be repeated early in
the posttraumatic period even in patients with mild to moderate head i
njury. In particular, we recommend that patients having sustained diff
use brain injuries should be transferred to neurotraumatology units fo
r specialised management, even when there may not be immediately obvio
us indications for surgical intervention.