Mtv. Johnson et al., INDEPENDENT CONTROL OF REFLEX AND VOLITIONAL EMG MODULATION DURING SINUSOIDAL PURSUIT TRACKING IN HUMANS, Experimental Brain Research, 96(2), 1993, pp. 347-362
It is well known that during volitional sinusoidal tracking the long-l
atency reflex modulates in parallel with the volitional EMG activity.
In this study, a series of experiments are reported demonstrating seve
ral conditions in which an uncoupling of reflex from volitional activi
ty occurs. The paradigm consists of a visually guided task in which th
e subject tracked a sinusoid with the wrist. The movement was perturbe
d by constant torque or controlled velocity perturbations at 45-degree
s intervals of the tracking phase. Volitional and reflex-evoked EMG an
d wrist displacement as functions of the tracking phase were recorded.
The relationship of both short-latency (30-60 ms) and longer-latency
(60-100 ms) reflex components to the volitional EMG was evaluated. In
reflex tracking, the peak reflex amplitude occurs at phases of trackin
g which correspond to a maximum of wrist joint angular velocity in the
direction of homonymous muscle shortening and a minimum of wrist comp
liance. Uncoupling of the reflex and volitional EMG was observed in th
ree situations. First, during passive movement of the wrist through th
e sinusoidal tracking cycle perturbation-evoked long-latency stretch r
eflex peak is modulated as for normal, volitional tracking. However, w
ith passive joint movement the volitional EMG modulation is undetectab
le. Second, a subset of subjects demonstrate a normally modulated and
positioned long-latency reflex with a single peak. However, these subj
ects have distinct bimodal peaks of volitional EMG. Third, the imposit
ion of an anti-elastic load (positive position feedback) shifts the vo
litional EMG envelope by as much as 180-degrees along the tracking pha
se when compared with conventional elastic loading. Yet the long-laten
cy reflex peak remains at its usual phase in the tracking cycle, corre
sponding to the maximal velocity in the direction of muscle shortening
. Furthermore, comparison of the results from elastic and anti-elastic
loads reveals a dissociation of short- and long-latency reflex activi
ty, with the short-latency reflex shifting with the volitional EMG env
elope. Comparable results were also obtained for controlled velocity p
erturbations used to control for changes in joint compliance. The unco
upling of the reflex and volitional EMG activity in the present series
of experiments points to a flexible relationship between reflex and v
olitional control systems, altered by peripheral input and external lo
ad.