ECVAM's role in the practical validation of replacement alternative me
thods for use in regulatory testing is reviewed, including an outline
of the criteria which have been used in determining ECVAM's priorities
. Some of the difficulties which have arisen in validation studies are
discussed, and solutions to these are proposed, with particular empha
sis on ensuring that methods are sufficiently well-developed to enter
the validation process, and on the ECVAM prevalidation scheme for enco
uraging protocol optimisation and the prior assessment of interlaborat
ory transferability. Comments are made on problems encountered in sele
cting test materials backed by adequate in vivo data and in undertakin
g appropriate in vivo/in vitro comparisons.