The potential utility of Fe-55 as a tracer for Fe(III) reduction in aq
uatic sediments was evaluated using freshwater sediments from the Poto
mac River, Md, in which Fe(III) reduction was the predominant terminal
electron accepting process. In laboratory incubations of sediments am
ended with poorly crystalline Fe-55(III) oxide, the accumulation of Fe
-55 in Fe(II) over time paralleled Fe(II) production. However, within
1 h of addition of Fe-55(III) oxide, significant quantities of Fe-55 w
ere recovered in extractable (1 M sodium acetate, pH 5) and soluble Fe
(II) pools. There was proportionately more Fe-55(II) activity in sedim
ents with higher Fe(II) concentrations. These results suggest that the
re was rapid isotopic exchange between Fe-55 in poorly crystalline Fe(
III) oxide and the Fe(II) pools. Because of this exchange, Fe-55 could
not be used to trace Fe(III) reduction in sediments in the manner tha
t (SO42-)-S-35 is used to trace sulfate reduction. Although accumulati
on of Fe-55 in Fe(II) pools paralleled unlabeled Fe(II) production, gi
ven the relative ease with which Fe(II) pools in sediments can be meas
ured there is no apparent advantage to using Fe-55 to follow Fe(III) r
eduction.