J. Hirvonen et al., TRANSDERMAL PENETRATION ENHANCERS IN RABBIT PINNA SKIN - DURATION OF ACTION, SKIN IRRITATION, AND IN-VIVO IN-VITRO COMPARISON, International journal of pharmaceutics, 99(2-3), 1993, pp. 253-261
Irritation of the skin by chemical penetration enhancers may limit the
use of these compounds in transdermal drug delivery. Biodegradable en
hancers like dodecyl N,N-dimethylamino acetate (DDAA) have been synthe
sized previously to decrease the duration of action and toxicity of th
e enhancers. We studied the reversibility and extent of penetration en
hancement and skin irritation by DDAA, Azone, and n-dodecanol in rabbi
t pinna skin using timolol and propranolol as penetrants. Also, in vit
ro and in vivo permeabilities of the drugs with and without enhancers
were compared. Drug concentrations in diffusion chambers and rabbit pl
asma were determined using HPLC and radio receptor assay, respectively
. Skin irritation was measured with a chromameter. DDAA and Azone caus
ed approximately equal transdermal penetration enhancement of model dr
ugs in vitro but the potency of n-dodecanol was lower. In vivo, Azone
was the most irritating enhancer in rabbit pinna skin. Both enhancer e
ffects and skin irritation by DDAA were reversed in 4 days, while the
effects of Azone and n-dodecanol lasted longer. Thus, it is possible t
o affect the duration of skin alteration by enhancer design. Propranol
ol was more irritating than timolol in rabbit pinna skin in vivo. Perc
utaneous permeability of propranolol in vivo, calculated from pharmaco
kinetic parameters, was considerably greater than its in vitro permeab
ility coefficient. In contrast, in vitro and in vivo permeability coef
ficients of timolol were comparable. The increased permeation of propr
anolol in vivo may be due to skin irritation, because in vivo permeabi
lity coefficients correlated with associated skin irritation.