This paper discusses the issues involved in using simplified second-or
der inelastic analysis for design of steel-frame structures. In partic
ular the elastic-plastic hinge method is examined and the assumptions
inherent in its use are outlined. It is shown that this method does no
t always lead to an accurate representation of inelastic behavior, and
that it does not furnish enough information for assessment of the ult
imate strength of individual members. An alternative approach called t
he refined plastic-hinge method is introduced, and its design implicat
ions are discussed. The refined plastic-hinge approach accounts for in
elastic stiffness degradation, and a column tangent-modulus expression
is utilized to represent the effective stiffness of the element when
it is loaded with large axial loads. This paper highlights and illustr
ates the qualities and limitations of these two inelastic analysis met
hods with regard to their acceptability for use in predicting the ulti
mate strengths of steel frames and their members. Case studies and rec
ommendations for use of inelastic analysis for direct frame design are
presented in a companion paper.