LEXICAL KNOWLEDGE REPRESENTATION AND NATURAL-LANGUAGE PROCESSING

Citation
J. Pustejovsky et B. Boguraev, LEXICAL KNOWLEDGE REPRESENTATION AND NATURAL-LANGUAGE PROCESSING, Artificial intelligence, 63(1-2), 1993, pp. 193-223
Citations number
59
Categorie Soggetti
Ergonomics,"Computer Sciences, Special Topics","Computer Applications & Cybernetics
Journal title
ISSN journal
00043702
Volume
63
Issue
1-2
Year of publication
1993
Pages
193 - 223
Database
ISI
SICI code
0004-3702(1993)63:1-2<193:LKRANP>2.0.ZU;2-Y
Abstract
Traditionally, semantic information in computational lexicons is limit ed to notions such as selectional restrictions or domain-specific cons traints, encoded in a ''static'' representation. This information is t ypically used in natural language processing by a simple knowledge man ipulation mechanism limited to the ability to match valences of struct urally related words. The most advanced device for imposing structure on lexical information is that of inheritance, both at the object (lex ical items) and meta (lexical concepts) levels of lexicon. In this pap er we argue that this is an impoverished view of a computational lexic on and that, for all its advantages, simple inheritance lacks the desc riptive power necessary for characterizing fine-grained distinctions i n the lexical semantics of words. We describe a theory of lexical sema ntics making use of a knowledge representation framework that offers a richer, more expressive vocabulary for lexical information. In partic ular, by performing specialized inference over the ways in which aspec ts of knowledge structures of words in context can be composed, mutual ly compatible and contextually relevant lexical components of words an d phrases are highlighted. We discuss the relevance of this view of th e lexicon, as an explanatory device accounting for language creativity , as well as a mechanism underlying the implementation of open-ended n atural language processing systems. In particular, we demonstrate how lexical ambiguity resolution-now an integral part of the same procedur e that creates the semantic interpretation of a sentence itself-become s a process not of selecting from a pre-determined set of senses, but of highlighting certain lexical properties brought forth by, and relev ant to, the current context.