N. Ward et al., A GLOBAL OVERVIEW AND HOPE FOR THE ERADICATION OF POLIOMYELITIS BY THE YEAR 2000, Tropical and geographical medicine, 45(5), 1993, pp. 198-202
The path to disease eradication is littered with failures in which opt
imism, usually based on the early success of a new intervention, outwe
ighed realization of the problems involved. Only one disease, smallpox
, has been eradicated. Not only did smallpox eradication remove foreve
r the threat of an appalling disease, it also defined the requirements
for disease eradication, showed that a soundly-based, well-coordinate
d programme could achieve rapid results and that disease eradication,
where possible, is highly cost effective. This is demonstrated by the
fact that the largest donor to the smallpox eradication programme cont
inues to recoup its full contribution once every 26 days. Smallpox era
dication succeeded for five main reasons that have continuing relevanc
e for other eradication initiatives: the causative organism was eradic
able. It only affected humans, was antigenically stable and had limite
d survival outside the body; the disease was seen as a major problem,
being a threat to public health and could be readily diagnosed; the pr
otective vaccine was stable, reliably effective and could be administe
red easily by persons with minimal training; eradication strategies we
re simple, epidemiologically appropriate, could be easily taught, but
could be interpreted flexibly to meet local conditions; there was poli
tical will to succeed, backed up by strong leadership directing the co
mmitment of concerned health professionals and with sufficient resourc
es to provide essential support. The table compares the attributes of
the two diseases, smallpox and poliomyelitis and the programmes aimed
at their eradication. All conditions essential for virus eradication a
re shared by both programmes. Polio eradication faces greater difficul
ties, particularly since most infections are subclinical but still inf
ectious.