Jm. Jausseran et al., CONNECTED SURGERY OF CAROTID AND SUBCLAVI AN ARTERIES - INDICATIONS AND RESULTS, Journal des maladies vasculaires, 18(3), 1993, pp. 265-268
Over a 5 year period (1988-1992), 6 patients were treated by combined
carotid and subclavian artery surgery, representing 0.7 % of carotid i
nterventions practised during this period. The carotid lesion clinical
stage was 0 (2 cases), 1 (2 cases) and 3 (2 cases). While for the sub
clavian artery 4 patients were asymptomatic and 2 had vertebrobasilar
syndromes, one associated with ischemia of upper limb. Only one patien
t was globally asymptomatic but the diagnosis was a prethrombotic caro
tid restenosis. Radiographs showed that the atheromatous lesion of the
cervical trunks was equivalent to 2.83 stenoses per patient. The deci
sion to use the combined interventions was based on either the clinica
l condition (combined carotid and vertebrobasilar symptomatology) or h
emodynamic data (improvement in subclavian flow during carotid surgery
). This hemodynamic component could be determined by transcranial Dopp
ler. Operation consisted always of initial subclavian revascularizatio
n (1 reimplantation, 5 bypasses), followed by carotid surgery (2 graft
s, 4 endarterectomies). The postoperative course was uneventful in 5 p
atients, the 6th patient requiring recovery surgery for early carotid
thrombosis without worsening of the neurologic state. Mean follow up w
as 9 months (range 1 to 27 months). Combining these two interventions
in this small series did not appear to increase carotid surgery compli
cation. Initial revascularization of the subclavian artery in the pati
ent with multiple trunk lesions corrected the posterior hemodynamic su
pply to the circle of Willis (J Mal Vasc, 1993, 18, pp. 265-268).