L. Rombo et al., COMPARATIVE TOLERABILITY AND KINETICS DURING LONG-TERM INTAKE OF LARIAM(R) AND FANSIDAR(R) FOR MALARIA PROPHYLAXIS IN NONIMMUNE VOLUNTEERS, Tropical medicine and parasitology, 44(3), 1993, pp. 254-256
One hundred and five healthy nonimmunes in Colombia took part in a ran
domised, double-blind comparison of 250 mg of Lariam (L) (active ingre
dient: mefloquine) on alternate weeks or one tablet of Fansidar (F) (a
ctive ingredients: sulfadoxine and pyrimethamine) weekly for malaria p
rophylaxis during at least six months. Volunteers also gave blood for
determination of drug concentrations after six months and/or 24-27 mon
ths of prophylaxis. Twenty-five volunteers withdrew involuntarily when
they lost their jobs in the company. Two who took L withdrew due to m
oderate diarrhea and mild nausea or headache, weakness, drowsiness and
anxiety. One volunteer stopped taking F due to severe unilateral hypo
static eczema and slight S-T depressions on the ECG. The rest complete
d at least six (range 6-36) months of prophylaxis. The mean half-life
for L was 26 days. The AUCs in the time inter-val 0 - 14 days for L va
ried between 19.3 - 31.5 mumol x days/l. For the main metabolite, the
corresponding range was 28.8-81.3 mumol x days/l. The range of trough
concentrations at day 0 and 14 were 0.95-2.01 mumol/l for 1, and 1.69-
5.62 mumol/l for the metabolite. No differences in tolerability and ef
ficacy were noted between L and F. Our kinetic results do not indicate
that enzymatic induction or inhibition would be important during long
-term prophylaxis with mefloquine. This favors a continued use of the
drug for very long periods of time (= years).