A COMPARISON OF REAL-TIME COMPRESSION ULTRASONOGRAPHY WITH IMPEDANCE PLETHYSMOGRAPHY FOR THE DIAGNOSIS OF DEEP-VEIN THROMBOSIS IN SYMPTOMATIC OUTPATIENTS
H. Heijboer et al., A COMPARISON OF REAL-TIME COMPRESSION ULTRASONOGRAPHY WITH IMPEDANCE PLETHYSMOGRAPHY FOR THE DIAGNOSIS OF DEEP-VEIN THROMBOSIS IN SYMPTOMATIC OUTPATIENTS, The New England journal of medicine, 329(19), 1993, pp. 1365-1369
Background. Impedance plethysmography performed serially over a one-we
ek period has been shown to be an effective diagnostic strategy for pa
tients with clinically suspected acute deep-vein thrombosis. Compressi
on ultrasonography has a high sensitivity and specificity for the dete
ction of proximal-vein thrombosis. The clinical value of repeated ultr
asonography in the management of symptomatic deep-vein thrombosis is u
nknown. Methods. We conducted a randomized trial in 985 consecutive ou
tpatients with clinically suspected deep-vein thrombosis to compare th
e diagnostic value of serial impedance plethysmography (494 patients)
and serial compression ultrasonography (491 patients). We compared the
positive predictive values of both tests for the diagnosis of venous
thrombosis, using contrast venography as a reference. The frequencies
of venous thromboembolism during a six-month follow-up period were als
o compared in patients with repeatedly normal results in order to eval
uate the safety of withholding anticoagulant therapy from such patient
s. Results. The positive predictive value of an abnormal ultrasonogram
was 94 percent (95 percent confidence interval, 87 to 98 percent), wh
ereas the predictive value of impedance plethysmography was 83 percent
(95 percent confidence interval, 75 to 90 percent) (P = 0.02). In pat
ients with repeatedly normal results, the incidence of venous thromboe
mbolism during the six-month follow-up period was 1.5 percent (95 perc
ent confidence interval, 0.5 to 3.3 percent) for serial compression ul
trasonography, as compared with 2.5 percent (95 percent confidence int
erval, 1.2 to 4.6 percent) for serial impedance plethysmography. Concl
usions. In making the diagnosis of deep-vein thrombosis in symptomatic
outpatients, serial compression ultrasonography is preferable to impe
dance plethysmography, in view of its superior performance in detectin
g venous thrombosis.