EVALUATION OF 2-BREED COMPOSITES ALONGSIDE ANGUS OR HEREFORD CONTROLSFOR GROWTH, REPRODUCTION, MATERNAL, AND CARCASS TRAITS

Citation
Ca. Morris et al., EVALUATION OF 2-BREED COMPOSITES ALONGSIDE ANGUS OR HEREFORD CONTROLSFOR GROWTH, REPRODUCTION, MATERNAL, AND CARCASS TRAITS, New Zealand Journal of Agricultural Research, 36(3), 1993, pp. 327-340
Citations number
20
Categorie Soggetti
Agriculture,"Agriculture Dairy & AnumalScience
ISSN journal
00288233
Volume
36
Issue
3
Year of publication
1993
Pages
327 - 340
Database
ISI
SICI code
0028-8233(1993)36:3<327:EO2CAA>2.0.ZU;2-G
Abstract
Angus (A) and Hereford (H) cows at one location and A cows at a second location were used to generate purebred controls and six first-cross (F1) types of calf. Foundation sires were A, H, Friesian (F), Jersey ( J), and South Devon (Sd) at Location 1, generating FH, FA, JA, SdA, an d HA (plus AH) F1 calves, and at Location 2 sires were A and Blonde d' Aquitaine (Ba), generating-BaA F1s. Sire breeds were selected as poten tially contributing to productive crossbred cows, based on previous F1 cow comparisons. In subsequent years F2, F3, and F4 calves were produ ced from each of the two-breed crosses, with overlapping generations a nd contemporary controls providing balanced comparisons of breed types and generations. The experiment consisted of 395 unique sires and 524 3 calves born in 1973-88 at Location 1 and 105 different sires and 240 4 calves born in 1976-86 at Location 2. Growth, reproduction, maternal , and carcass traits were studied. Heterosis was estimated from HA (pl us AH) and purebred A and H animals, but only breed x generation effec ts were estimated from the other two-breed crosses because of the abse nce of reciprocal F1 matings. Heterosis from HA crosses was 3.5 and 6. 3% for direct effects on weaning and yearling weights respectively, an d 9.0% for the maternal (i.e. F1 cow) effect on weaning weight. For re production of F1 HA cows, heterosis was 15.2% for calf crop weaned per cow joined, 25.4% for productivity (calf weaning weight per cow joine d), and 18.1% for an efficiency ratio (i.e. productivity/average cow w eight). Over all six two-breed crosses, relative to purebred controls, advantages of F1s averaged 4.4 and 8.1% for direct effects on weaning and yearling weights respectively, and 13.3% for the maternal (F1 cow ) effect on weaning weight. For reproduction, the Fl cow advantage ove r controls averaged 9.7% for calf crop weaned per cow joined (range -7 .3 to +15.2%), 24.7% for productivity (range -8.9 to 47.3%), and 16.8% for the efficiency ratio (range -15.7 to +36.3%). For the efficiency ratio, breed types were ranked FH (greatest), JA, FA, HA, SdA, A, H, a nd BaA. On average, the F3 and F4 calves out-performed the F1 s by 6.3 % in weaning weight but were similar to F1s in yearling weight, wherea s for maternal weaning weight the means for F3 cows' calves were 3.4% below those for F1 cows. For reproduction, averages of F3s were below those of F1s but superior to the purebreds by 7.2, 17.7, and 16.3% for calves weaned per cow joined, productivity, and the efficiency ratio respectively. There were also significant breed-group differences in c arcass composition.