Ca. Morris et al., EVALUATION OF 3-BREED COMPOSITES ALONGSIDE ANGUS CONTROLS FOR GROWTH,REPRODUCTION, MATERNAL, AND CARCASS TRAITS, New Zealand Journal of Agricultural Research, 36(3), 1993, pp. 341-348
Angus cows at two locations were used to generate purebred controls an
d three three-breed crosses, as a result of inter-mating two-breed (ha
lfbred Angus) crosses. The three-breed crosses were: 25% Simmental, 25
% Friesian, 50% Angus (SiFA) from reciprocal matings between SiA and F
A crosses; 25% Maine Anjou, 25% Jersey, 50% Angus (MaJA) from reciproc
al matings between MaA and JA crosses; and 25% Blonde d'Aquitaine, 25%
Jersey, 50% Angus (BaJA) both from matings between JA bulls and BaA c
ows, and from matings between BaJ bulls and A cows. Breed crosses for
this experiment were selected as potentially contributing to productiv
e crossbred cows, based on the early years of two-breed cross data. Af
ter producing the first generation (F1) of three-breed crosses, each c
ross was subsequently interbred to produce F2 and F3 calves (202 sire
groups overall). There were overlapping generations and contemporary c
ontrols, to compare crosses for growth, reproduction, maternal and car
cass traits. The three three-breed crosses had greater yearling weight
s as F1s than contemporary A animals, by an average of 7.5%. Calf surv
ival of the breed-types and generations was similar to A, except for S
iFA F1 calves which experienced more difficulty and 17% greater birth
weights than A calves. Three-breed cross cows were, on average, 7% hea
vier than A cows as F1s and their calves were 11% heavier at weaning t
han A calves. On average, the F1 cows showed a 12% advantage over A in
calves weaned per cow joined, 24% in productivity, and 16% in product
ivity adjusted for cow weight (efficiency ratio). For carcass data (Ba
JA and A only), the BaJA calves were heavier and leaner than A control
s. The breed types varied in their advantages in efficiency ratio, rel
ative to A, and this appeared to depend on the pathway and dam genotyp
e used to breed them. The efficiency ratio of contemporary two-breed c
rosses was similar to that of the three-breed crosses on average. The
best breed types were two-breed crosses, so the three-breed crosses we
re likely to be less favoured by the farmer.