SOMATIC COMORBIDITY IN PERSONALITY-DISORDER INPATIENTS - EFFECT ON TREATMENT OUTCOME IN A 3-YEAR FOLLOW-UP-STUDY

Citation
R. Antikainen et J. Hintikka, SOMATIC COMORBIDITY IN PERSONALITY-DISORDER INPATIENTS - EFFECT ON TREATMENT OUTCOME IN A 3-YEAR FOLLOW-UP-STUDY, Nordic journal of psychiatry, 50(6), 1996, pp. 469-476
Citations number
23
Categorie Soggetti
Psychiatry
ISSN journal
08039488
Volume
50
Issue
6
Year of publication
1996
Pages
469 - 476
Database
ISI
SICI code
0803-9488(1996)50:6<469:SCIPI->2.0.ZU;2-N
Abstract
Few studies have been published on the effects of physical comorbidity on the course or outcome of psychiatric inpatient treatment. In a psy chiatric ward specializing in the psychotherapeutic treatment of borde rline disorders, changes in symptoms and social management of 42 patie nts were monitored during an average hospitalization period of 91 days (range, 21-296 days) and a 3-year follow-up period. Physical health s tatus was estimated during a follow-up interview on the basis of the m edical records of the general hospital in question. Ages of the patien ts Varied between 20 and 59 years (median, 41 years). Only 21% had no diagnosed physical illness. The others had mild or temporary (62%) or serious (17%) physical illnesses. During the entire study period, reli ef of symptoms as assessed on the basis of the Hamilton Depression Rat ing Scale (HDRS) or the Beck Depression Inventory (BDI) was most marke d in patients without physical illness. Depression and anxiety continu ed to decrease after the end of inpatient treatment. In patients with mild physical symptoms the degree of depression on admission was simil ar to that in otherwise healthy patients. Their depression decreased d uring inpatient treatment. During follow-up, symptoms remained at the levels observed at the end of inpatient treatment. Patients with serio us illness had the mildest depression and anxiety at the beginning of the treatment, but symptoms increased during the treatment. These diff erences in treatment outcome were interpreted as consequences of diffe rent levels of psychic energy available for psychic work in the groups compared.