Mja. Janssen et al., METHODS IN HEART-RATE-VARIABILITY ANALYSIS - WHICH TACHOGRAM SHOULD WE CHOOSE, Computer methods and programs in biomedicine, 41(1), 1993, pp. 1-8
We investigated the practical impact of the representation of the card
iac rhythm - the cardiotachogram - on two elementary spectral indexes
in heart rate variability analysis: the low-frequency (0.07-0.14 Hz) a
nd high-frequency (0.14-0.40 Hz) powers. Five commonly used tachograms
(inter-beat interval function/series, counts, instantaneous heart rat
e function/series) were compared. Measurements were done on seven volu
nteers in the supine and standing positions. Ratios, and their deviati
ons from 100%, of alternative power values were calculated. Mean low-f
requency and high-frequency ratio deviations ranged from 0 to 5% and f
rom 6 to 37%. The spectrum of counts yielded on average more (15-37%)
high-frequency power. Spectra were incomparable without normalization
of the tachogram with respect to heart rate. In conclusion, (i) the ch
oice of a particular spectrum may lead to differing conclusions on the
vagal contribution to heart rate variability and (ii) inconclusive re
sults from studies using different tachogram variants can partly be du
e to the omission of normalization.