CHARACTERIZATION BY FLOW-CYTOMETRY AND FLUORESCEIN METHOTREXATE LABELING OF HYDROPHILIC AND LIPOPHILIC ANTIFOLATE RESISTANCE IN CULTURED-MAMMALIAN-CELLS
Yg. Assaraf, CHARACTERIZATION BY FLOW-CYTOMETRY AND FLUORESCEIN METHOTREXATE LABELING OF HYDROPHILIC AND LIPOPHILIC ANTIFOLATE RESISTANCE IN CULTURED-MAMMALIAN-CELLS, Anti-cancer drugs, 4(5), 1993, pp. 535-544
The aim of this review is to summarize currently available information
on the rapid screening and initial characterization of the different
mechanisms of resistance to hydrophilic [e.g. methotrexate (MTX)] and
lipophilic antifolates [e.g. trimetrexate (TMTX)] in cultured mammalia
n cells using fluorescein-methotrexate (F-MTX) and flow cytometry. Tow
ard this end an integrative F-MTX labeling and flow cytometry-based pr
otocol Is proposed here to facilitate the rapid identification of mode
s of antifolate resistance in a heterogenous drug-resistant cell popul
ation or in clonal derivatives. Following antifolate selection, drug-r
esistant cells are first labeled with F-MTX in order to saturate intra
cellular dihydrofolate reductase (DHFR). F-MTX-labeled cells are then
subjected to flow cytometric analysis and mean fluorescence/cell is de
termined. Thus, increased F-MTX staining is an indication of overprodu
ction of the target enzyme for antifolates, DHFR, as a result of DHFR
gene amplification. in contrast, significantly reduced cellular F-MTX
labeling could be an indication of the existence of a structurally alt
ered DHFR displaying a decreased affinity for antifolates. Alternative
ly, antifolate-resistant cells frequently display wild-type F-MTX labe
ling; these cells are subjected to competition with hydrophilic and li
pophilic antifolates in order to examine whether the process of antifo
late accumulation is deficient. Cells that lose F-MTX labeling upon co
mpetition with lipophilic antifolates yet still retain it with hydroph
ilic antifolates, are likely to possess transport alteration(s) that i
mpair or abolish the accumulation of hydrophilic but not of lipophilic
antifolates. In contrast, cells that lose their F-MTX labeling after
competition with hydrophilic antifolates but retain it with lipophilic
antifolates, possess a deficient accumulation of lipophilic antifolat
es. The importance of the antifolate concentration yielding 50% displa
cement of cellular F-MTX labeling in the quantitative assessment of th
e degree of DHFR overexpression and/or antifolate transport alteration
is discussed. Thus, flow cytometric analysis of F-MTX-labeled cells f
ollowing competition with hydrophilic and lipophilic antifolates provi
des a useful tool for the rapid screening and assessment of the major
modes of antifolate resistance that may appear as exclusive mechanisms
or co-emerge in mammalian cells following antifolate selection.