Sg. Gourlay et al., DISCORDANCE OF MERCURY SPHYGMOMANOMETER AND AMBULATORY BLOOD-PRESSUREMEASUREMENTS FOR THE DETECTION OF UNTREATED HYPERTENSION IN A POPULATION STUDY, Journal of human hypertension, 7(5), 1993, pp. 467-472
To evaluate the extent to which ambulatory blood pressure (ABP) measur
ements could redefine the prevalence of untreated hypertension in the
general population, we studied a randomly selected subgroup of the Nat
ional Heart Foundation of Australia's Risk Factor Prevalence Study 198
9. Subjects taking blood pressure (BP) lowering medications were exclu
ded, leaving 66 patients with 24h ABP recordings for analysis. Mean aw
ake ABPs were generally lower than survey BPs and diminished with redu
ced activity (away from work and during sleep). The correlation of sur
vey BP and daytime ABP (10.00-20.00 h) classification of untreated hyp
ertension was moderate (Cohen's correlation coefficient 0.490. 56). Un
treated hypertension was identified in 20 subjects by the mercury sphy
gmomanometer technique (BP greater-than-or-equal-to 150/90 mmHg). Six
(30%) of those subjects had a mean ABP < 135/85 mmHg suggesting 'normo
tension' on ambulatory criteria. Conversely, 19 subjects had a mean AB
P of greater-than-or-equal-to 135/85 mmHg, five (26%) of whom had 'nor
mal' survey BPs. We conclude that ambulatory and mercury sphygmomanome
ter methods of BP measurement in this population study defined a simil
ar prevalence of untreated hypertension but were discordant for a subs
tantial percentage of individuals. The prognostic significance of ABP
levels and any discordance with survey or office mercury sphygmomanome
ter BP readings will remain uncertain until prospective studies using
both forms of measurement are completed.