A RANDOMIZED DOUBLE-BLIND PLACEBO-CONTROLLED STUDY OF AZELASTINE NASAL SPRAY IN CHILDREN WITH PERENNIAL RHINITIS

Citation
D. Herman et al., A RANDOMIZED DOUBLE-BLIND PLACEBO-CONTROLLED STUDY OF AZELASTINE NASAL SPRAY IN CHILDREN WITH PERENNIAL RHINITIS, International journal of pediatric otorhinolaryngology, 39(1), 1997, pp. 1-8
Citations number
9
Categorie Soggetti
Otorhinolaryngology,Pediatrics
ISSN journal
01655876
Volume
39
Issue
1
Year of publication
1997
Pages
1 - 8
Database
ISI
SICI code
0165-5876(1997)39:1<1:ARDPSO>2.0.ZU;2-4
Abstract
One hundred and twenty five children (median age 8.71 years) suffering from perennial allergic rhinitis were treated in a randomized, double -blind, parallel group study comparing azelastine nasal spray 0.14 mg/ nostril twice daily (0.56 mg/day) and placebo nasal spray. Medication was given for a period of 6 weeks which followed a 2 week placebo wash out period in all patients. Subjects were aged between 5 and 12 and we re skin prick positive to either house dust mites and/or cat or dog da nder. Concomitant anti allergic treatment was not permitted during the study. Severity of rhinitis symptoms was scored daily by the child or his/her parents on a diary card using a visual analogue scale (VAS) f or each evaluated symptom: 0, absent-100, could not be worse. Mean wee kly scores were calculated. Symptoms evaluated were: sneezing, nasal b lockage, nasal itch and rhinorrhea. In addition, at each clinic visit the investigator evaluated symptoms using a verbal score of 0, no symp tom-3, severe. Compared to the baseline, for each of the six study wee ks, the reduction in the VAS scores for all four symptoms was statisti cally greater for the azelastine group compared to the placebo group. The investigator's assessment at clinic visits bore out these results. Both azelastine nasal spray and placebo were well tolerated, no serio us adverse events were reported. During the treatment phase of the stu dy a total of 36 adverse events were reported by 25 patients (azelasti ne 10, placebo 15). The most frequently occurring events were pharyngi tis (azelastine 5, placebo 3), cough (azelastine 3, placebo 1) and bro nchitis (azelastine 1, placebo 3). In conclusion, azelastine has been shown to be effective in the treatment of perennial rhinitis in childr en aged 5-12 years and to be superior to placebo in the relief of all symptoms assessed, namely sneezing. nasal blockage, nasal itch and rhi norrhea. (C) 1997 Elsevier Science Ireland Ltd.