PRELIMINARY-ANALYSIS OF THE DYNAMIC INTERACTION BETWEEN NORRA-LANKEN AND A SUBWAY TUNNEL FOR STOCKHOLM, SWEDEN

Authors
Citation
L. Rosengren, PRELIMINARY-ANALYSIS OF THE DYNAMIC INTERACTION BETWEEN NORRA-LANKEN AND A SUBWAY TUNNEL FOR STOCKHOLM, SWEDEN, Tunnelling and underground space technology, 8(4), 1993, pp. 429-439
Citations number
NO
Categorie Soggetti
Engineering, Civil","Construcion & Building Technology
ISSN journal
08867798
Volume
8
Issue
4
Year of publication
1993
Pages
429 - 439
Database
ISI
SICI code
0886-7798(1993)8:4<429:POTDIB>2.0.ZU;2-C
Abstract
A large infrastructure project called ''Ring road Around Stockholm'' i s presently being planned. A large proportion of the roads will be con structed underground. All kinds of hazardous materials; even explosive gases and liquids, will be allowed to be transported. At Roslagstull, which is located at the northern boundary of the city, five undergrou nd road tunnels will cross over an existing subway tunnel, with only a bout 3 m of rock between them. A scenario in which a truck loaded with explosive gas or liquid starts to leak and then explodes has been pro posed by Stockholm's Street and Traffic Administration. Consequently, the effect on rock and the reinforcement surrounding the subway tunnel . must be evaluated. This paper presents the results of a study based on two-dimensional distinct element modelling of the rock mass and rei nforcement response to a load caused by an exploding truck as describe d above. Two different assumptions regarding the explosion load have b een simulated - namely, static load and fully dynamic load, The study (i) provides general information about the rock mass and reinforcement response for a specific assumption regarding the rock mass conditions , and (ii) compares the results from the two different assumptions reg arding the representation of the explosion load. Both unreinforced and reinforced conditions have been modelled for each loading condition ( i.e., a total of four models). The results indicate that for the unrei nforced models, the differences in the model response are not dramatic when compared to the models with static and dynamic representation of the explosion load. On the other hand, the reinforced models indicate major differences, particularly in the reinforcement response. All nu merical analyses presented in this paper were performed using the two- dimensional distinct element code UDEC (Itasca 1992).