INFLUENCES OF SOME DESIGN PARAMETERS ON THE BIOMECHANICS OF THE UNREAMED TIBIAL INTRAMEDULLARY NAIL

Several questions relating to the biomechanics of the AO unreamed tibi al nail were addressed in this study. These included the effects of th e location of the nail bend on the reduction of a high proximal fractu re, and the relation of proximal locking screw hole orientation and fr acture component cortical contact to the mechanical stiffness of the c onstruct. To measure fracture site malalignment with nail insertion, a motion transducer mounted on the distal tibial shaft was used to trac k the position of the proximal component during and after insertion of the nail. For studying the effect of screw hole orientation, the intr amedullary (IM) nail was modified by drilling a second set of proximal screw holes with oblique instead of parallel alignment. The axial, to rsional, and varus-valgus stiffnesses of the constructs with parallel or oblique screws and with or without fracture site contact were deter mined. In an experimental model with an osteotomy located proximal to the position of the bend in the nail when fully inserted, anterior dis placement of the proximal fracture component (or posterior displacemen t of the distal component) of up to 1 cm was measured. Oblique proxima l locking screws significantly decreased both varus/valgus angulation and medial/lateral translation under load, compared with the parallel screws. Constructs were 117% and 55% as rigid as the intact tibia in a xial loading with and without cortical contact, and 6.5% and 3.1% as s tiff in torsion. This study led to the following conclusions: (a) If a n unreamed tibial nail is used to stabilize a fracture located superio r to the position of the bend of the nail when it is fully inserted, f racture malalignment may occur. (b) A pair of proximal locking screws oriented obliquely at 90-degrees to each other produce a more rigid co nstruct in varus/valgus loading than do a pair of parallel screws. (c) Cortical contact significantly improves the stiffness of the fixation . (d) More proximally positioned screws allow fixation of a larger ran ge of fractures, but at a cost of decreasing the axial stiffness of th e construct.