Bm. Ure et al., PREINCISIONAL LOCAL-ANESTHESIA WITH BUPIVACAINE AND PAIN AFTER LAPAROSCOPIC CHOLECYSTECTOMY - A DOUBLE-BLIND RANDOMIZED CLINICAL-TRIAL, Surgical endoscopy, 7(6), 1993, pp. 482-488
The aim of this study was to investigate whether local anesthesia of a
bdominal wall wounds prior to laparoscopic cholecystectomy leads to de
creased pain beyond the immediate postoperative period and thus improv
es the comfort of the patient. In a randomized, double-blind study 50
patients scheduled for laparoscopic cholecystectomy were divided into
two groups. In one group (n = 25) the skin, subcutis, fascia, muscle,
and preperitoneal space were infiltrated with 8 ml of bupivacaine 0.5%
5 min before each abdominal wall incision. The control group (n = 25)
received normal saline. The intensity of pain was assessed by a 100-p
oint visual analogue scale (VAS) at rest and during movement and by th
e consumption of analgesics. Analgesic therapy was provided by on-dema
nd analgesia with piritramid intravenously for 24 h and continued by i
buprofen orally on request. The mean intensity of pain at rest and dur
ing movement was lower but not statistically significant in patients w
ho received bupivacaine compared to the control group up to the second
postoperative day. The difference was between 4 and 9 VAS points and
therefore of doubtful clinical relevance. Similar statistically nonsig
nificant results were found for the mean consumption of piritramid up
to 16 h after the operation. Three patient's (12%) in the bupivacaine
group localized the most severe pain up to the second postoperative da
y to the right lower abdominal wall wound where the gallbladder had be
en extracted compared to 11 patients (44%) of the control group (P = 0
.012). These results indicate that bupivacaine was effective at the si
te where it was administered. However, preincisional local anesthesia
of the abdominal wall wounds in laparoscopic cholecystectomy does not
lead to a significant clinical benefit for the patient.