Jurisprudence traditionally approaches the law as an external object;
the jurisprudential scholar generally seeks to describe legal doctrine
in terms of its objective and observable properties. Professor Balkin
argues that seemingly fixed, inherent characteristics of legal doctri
ne-most notably, whether or not a given body of law is ''coherent'' or
possesses ''integrity''-are better understood as projections from the
individual observer. Judgments about legal coherence are in reality t
he result of only one of many interpretive postures an observer might
take, but one that implicates the integrity of the observer's own worl
d view. Furthermore, this process of interpretation does not leave the
observer untouched, for the process of interpretation itself construc
ts the observer.