P. Theroux et al., ASPIRIN VERSUS HEPARIN TO PREVENT MYOCARDIAL-INFARCTION DURING THE ACUTE-PHASE OF UNSTABLE ANGINA, Circulation, 88(5), 1993, pp. 2045-2048
Background. Antiplatelet therapy with aspirin and antithrombotic thera
py with heparin both prevent the complications of unstable angina; how
ever, no definitive data exist on the relative clinical efficacy of th
e two drugs. Methods and Results. Aspirin (325 mg bid) or heparin (500
0-U intravenous bolus followed by a perfusion titrated to the APTT) we
re compared in a double-blind randomized trial of 484 patients in two
cohorts enrolled sequentially. The study was initiated at admission to
hospital at a mean of 8.3+/-7.8 hours after the last episode of pain.
End points were assessed 5.7+/-3.3 days later, when the decision for
long-term management was made. Myocardial infarction occurred in 2 (0.
8%) of the 240 patients randomized to heparin and in 9 (3.7%) of the 2
44 randomized to aspirin (P=.035), an odds ratio of 0.22 and a risk di
fference of 2.9% (95% confidence limits, 0.3% to 5.6%) with heparin. T
he only death resulted from a myocardial infarction in an aspirin pati
ent. Survival curves with Cox logistic regression analysis showed that
the improvement in survival without myocardial infarction with hepari
n (P=.035) was independent of other baseline characteristics. Conclusi
ons. This study documents that heparin prevents myocardial infarction
better than aspirin during the acute phase of unstable angina.