When an antidumping policy involves the imposition of duties, the thre
at of antidumping enforcement may alter strategic behavior under imper
fect competition. This point is illustrated in a model where the forei
gn firm is a monopolist in its local market, but competes with a domes
tic firm in the home country's market. The welfare effects of an antid
umping policy are examined under quantity-setting and price-setting be
havior with either perfect or imperfect substitutes. Imposing an antid
umping policy frequently improves domestic welfare under quantity-sett
ing behavior, and typically worsens it under price-setting behavior. S
urprisingly, foreign welfare may improve.