COMPARISON OF THE ANALGESIC EFFECTS OF INTRATHECAL CLONIDINE AND INTRATHECAL MORPHINE AFTER SPINAL-ANESTHESIA IN PATIENTS UNDERGOING TOTAL HIP-REPLACEMENT
Dj. Fogarty et al., COMPARISON OF THE ANALGESIC EFFECTS OF INTRATHECAL CLONIDINE AND INTRATHECAL MORPHINE AFTER SPINAL-ANESTHESIA IN PATIENTS UNDERGOING TOTAL HIP-REPLACEMENT, British Journal of Anaesthesia, 71(5), 1993, pp. 661-664
We have studied the anaesthetic and analgesic properties of intratheca
l clonidine and intrathecal morphine in patients undergoing total hip
replacement under spinal anaesthesia. After routine spinal anaesthesia
With 0.5% plain bupivacaine 2.75 ml, patients were allocated randomly
to receive intrathecal clonidine, morphine or saline (control) as adj
uvant to the bupivacaine. Postoperative analgesic effects were measure
d by consumption of morphine via patient-controlled analgesia and visu
al analogue pain scores. Both intrathecal clonidine and intrathecal mo
rphine prolonged the time to first analgesia compared with saline (mea
n 278 (SD 93.2) min, 498 (282.4) min and 54 (61.9) min, respectively)
(P < 0.001). Total morphine consumption on the first night after opera
tion was significantly less in the intrathecal morphine group. There w
ere no differences between the clonidine and the control group. Intrat
hecal, clonidine prolonged the duration of spinal analgesia, but was m
arkedly inferior to the intrathecal morphine in providing subsequent p
ostoperative analgesia.